🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," commented the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, other states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.